popejubal wrote on Jan 12
th, 2011 at 11:50am:
Some dude named Jesus disagrees with you. If you don't follow him, that's cool with me. The Amish do want to follow him, so it's necessary for them to forgive others of their tresspasses.
Also, forgiveness doesn't have to be connected with consequences in any way. The Amish will cooperate with police investigations even while they forgive people who commit crimes against them. The forgiveness is given because it is right and because it is good, not because the criminal deserves it.
A point, though a bit of clarification there, I seem to also recollect a bit about render unto Ceasar, which would be the bit about still involving law enforcement in the matter.
Forgiveness vs Consequences are always a tricky thing, since leaning too far to the former leads to enabling further actions. Leaning too far the other way of course, doesn't give folks time to learn from their mistakes.
As a general philosophy, I personally prefer "least harm" scenarios. Sometimes the only way to stop a man running off a cliff in time is to shoot him in the leg.
On the general underlying issue -
I would say by and large, if the concern is revenge vs correction, one thing they could do is permanent removal of rep-points every time neg is given. That should, in theory, at least slow down anyone that would choose to get overly petty and run a train on someone else's rep bar.
On the specific poster -
It's not it's first reset. I can remember at least once before this one when it was reset. Make of that what you will.