Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
or
Register
News:
Board Index
Help
Login
Register
Vault
›
General
›
DDO-Specific Discussion
› Rangers
(Moderator: Strakeln)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
[2]
3
Send Topic
Print
Rangers (Read 16648 times)
Cale
Abbot Raider
Offline
Meh.... Drama
Posts: 954
Joined: May 9
th
, 2010
Re: Rangers
Reply #25 -
May 27
th
, 2011 at 7:44pm
Print Post
Bigjunk wrote
on May 27
th
, 2011 at 1:17pm:
Tempest III is a double-edge sword . . . I have two 18/1/1 rangers both STR-based. I have two friends who TR’d into Ranger 12/rogue 7/Monk 1 and the biggest difference is they can’t hit a fucking thing and I don’t have problems at all. 12/7/1 splits have better “spreadsheet” DPS but they lack to-hit which fucks them in epics. The biggest advantage of Tempest III is the lack of to-hit penalties and the +3 benefit from the Tempest ToD set. Sure, the other splashes do more damage on paper but you aren’t doing shit for DPS if you aren’t hitting.
This is where I stopped reading.
You realize that the HUGE difference in to hit bonus that you're talking about is a WHOLE +1, right?
... and that rogue sneak attack enhancements make up that difference completely....?
The to hit difference is non-existent for the most part.
Do people actually wear the Tempest set?
«
Last Edit: May 27
th
, 2011 at 7:49pm by Cale
»
IP Logged
Terebinthia
Horoluth Raider
Offline
All your cupcakes are
belong to me! :D
Posts: 2499
Joined: Jan 6
th
, 2011
Re: Rangers
Reply #26 -
May 27
th
, 2011 at 7:53pm
Print Post
This is all very interesting reading.
I have a capped exploiter, followed the classic build and it's human khopesh but I have CE rather than combat expertise. Terebynthia on Khyber on myDDO if you want to rip her to shreds...
At the mo I haven't ground for anything - I have a prot ring and that's about it. I seem to remember wandering around having done absolutely nothing her standing AC is 48, hardly exciting.
This has been fine for what I've been using her for, but I can see a path while I'm TRing my main of slowly improving my other toons. What quick fixes would you do to her? She has Nyokos band and that's it from TOD at the mo. Need to tier III my lit IIs, I know, but there's always other stuff to do. Should get a chance once I've built some HP gear for my soon to be Shroud capable paladin...
IP Logged
Invelios
VoD Slasher
Offline
Posts: 1965
Location: Houston, TX
Joined: Aug 3
rd
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #27 -
May 27
th
, 2011 at 10:03pm
Print Post
Cale wrote
on May 27
th
, 2011 at 7:44pm:
This is where I stopped reading.
You realize that the HUGE difference in to hit bonus that you're talking about is a WHOLE +1, right?
... and that rogue sneak attack enhancements make up that difference completely....?
The to hit difference is non-existent for the most part.
Do people actually wear the Tempest set?
Junk is about the last person I would second guess when it comes to rangers, he really does know his shit.
Ghallanda:
Invellios
,
Duesex
,
Aedificatus
Facebook
IP Logged
Semper
Waterworks Kobold
Offline
I Love Drama!
Posts: 173
Joined: Nov 25
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #28 -
May 27
th
, 2011 at 11:08pm
Print Post
Bigjunk wrote
on May 27
th
, 2011 at 1:18pm:
You'll never be able to do Horoth (though I have been forced to do it a few times when a main-tank died), but anything else in the game can be done in a 32 point life.
I tanked horoth when my ranger was a 32 ptr 40 plus times before I started his completionist journey he had plenty of hps and plenty of ac and made a healers job easy so I'm not sure why you think this and he was a str based ranger .. the build was 12/6/2 ranger/fighter/monk tempest II / stalwart
«
Last Edit: May 27
th
, 2011 at 11:08pm by Semper
»
IP Logged
Blank_Zero
Ex Member
Re: Rangers
Reply #29 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 12:01am
Print Post
If you wanna see a good build for an ac tank ranger, look up williace on khyber....
Has an 87 ac I believe, with no chattering right still. He went 12 ranger, 6 fighter, 2 monk. Elf with scimmies. I think he said he can hit 100 ac raid buffed, and I've watched him hold aggro through claw set barbarians....
He may be my gimpy guildie, but some of his toons are ok I guess
IP Logged
Semper
Waterworks Kobold
Offline
I Love Drama!
Posts: 173
Joined: Nov 25
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #30 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 12:08am
Print Post
I have a 12/6/2 ranger/paly/monk ac/hate build atm which has tanked and can tank every raid boss in game right now and hold agro just fine , as I have already stated i had a fighter mix before that was awesome as well both are or were 32 ptrs at the time or are now and have plenty of hps to do there job and can do enough dps to keep the agro np and can reach 85+ ac with power attack , I don't even take CE
IP Logged
Intervention
Waterworks Kobold
Offline
I Love Drama!
Posts: 128
Joined: Nov 13
th
, 2010
Re: Rangers
Reply #31 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 2:05am
Print Post
A few things to add here is to not bother with Tempest set there are three other sets I can think of off the top of my head that will be more efficient for you: Ravager, Kyosho's, and Encrusted.
As far as the too hit on the Tempest III vs. a Tempest II + rogue splash is really no difference at all. The enhancements from the rogue sneak attack accuracy is going to catch up with the Tempest III.
The only thing you'd have to worry about in that case is keeping up your DP scrolls, but that shouldn't be a problem in the first place as you should be doing that with an 18/1/1 split anyways.
IP Logged
Vissarion
DQ Assaulter
Offline
Posts: 493
Joined: Jul 23
rd
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #32 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 9:43am
Print Post
Intervention wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 2:05am:
A few things to add here is to not bother with Tempest set there are three other sets I can think of off the top of my head that will be more efficient for you: Ravager, Kyosho's, and Encrusted.
As far as the too hit on the Tempest III vs. a Tempest II + rogue splash is really no difference at all. The enhancements from the rogue sneak attack accuracy is going to catch up with the Tempest III.
The only thing you'd have to worry about in that case is keeping up your DP scrolls, but that shouldn't be a problem in the first place as you should be doing that with an 18/1/1 split anyways.
Well, the Tempest set doesn't compete with the Ravager/Encrusted set, but I'm wondering why it wouldn't be desirable over the Shintao set? The Shintao set provides +2 attack/+2 damage, but the Tempest set provides +3 attack/+1-4 slashing damage if one is a Tempest III. Is there something I'm missing here?
Theologians don't know nothin' about my soul
IP Logged
Epoch
Alaskan Ice Hole
Offline
Epochalypse
Posts: 10377
Location: Frozen Tundra
Joined: Aug 29
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #33 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 9:47am
Print Post
Vissarion wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 9:43am:
Well, the Tempest set doesn't compete with the Ravager/Encrusted set, but I'm wondering why it wouldn't be desirable over the Shintao set? The Shintao set provides +2 attack/+2 damage, but the Tempest set provides +3 attack/+1-4 slashing damage if one is a Tempest III. Is there something I'm missing here?
Hmm, I wonder what it could be?
OnePercenter wrote
on May 15
th
, 2014 at 9:41am:
I just read that the cat followed up by visiting the dog house later that night, dropping some Willie Pete in on the sleeping dog. #epochsfamiliarFTW
Sim-Sala-Bim wrote
on Jan 27
th
, 2014 at 2:09am:
It seems like Epoch never loses his popularity.
Even against donuts.
IP Logged
Blank_Zero
Ex Member
Re: Rangers
Reply #34 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 3:30pm
Print Post
Vissarion wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 9:43am:
Well, the Tempest set doesn't compete with the Ravager/Encrusted set, but I'm wondering why it wouldn't be desirable over the Shintao set? The Shintao set provides +2 attack/+2 damage, but the Tempest set provides +3 attack/+1-4 slashing damage if one is a Tempest III. Is there something I'm missing here?
That extra 1-4 damage is not affected by your weapon type, meaning its still subject to Dr. That makes it useless against anything with any sort of Dr.
Kyosho's ring adds 2 damage to your base damage total, meaning it is affected by the weapon type.
If the tempest set added to base damage, I'd already have it equipped :p
IP Logged
Vissarion
DQ Assaulter
Offline
Posts: 493
Joined: Jul 23
rd
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #35 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 6:20pm
Print Post
Quote:
That extra 1-4 damage is not affected by your weapon type, meaning its still subject to Dr. That makes it useless against anything with any sort of Dr.
Kyosho's ring adds 2 damage to your base damage total, meaning it is affected by the weapon type.
If the tempest set added to base damage, I'd already have it equipped :p
Oh, wow, that's pretty stupid item design, then. I had always assumed that it worked like the Brawling Gloves piercing damage, since that just adds 1-4 damage regardless of DR. Had no idea that the 1-4 slashing damage was negated by DR.
In which case, then the Shintao set really does seem dramatically superior.
Theologians don't know nothin' about my soul
IP Logged
Epoch
Alaskan Ice Hole
Offline
Epochalypse
Posts: 10377
Location: Frozen Tundra
Joined: Aug 29
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #36 -
May 28
th
, 2011 at 11:41pm
Print Post
Vissarion wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 6:20pm:
Oh, wow, that's pretty stupid item design, then. I had always assumed that it worked like the Brawling Gloves piercing damage, since that just adds 1-4 damage regardless of DR. Had no idea that the 1-4 slashing damage was negated by DR.
In which case, then the Shintao set really does seem dramatically superior.
Game mechanics, fun stuff. I figured that since you were part of the silverish dragons you knew that. They used to be pretty knowledgeable about that stuff awhile ago. Are they still active? I hardly ever see you guys around anymore.
OnePercenter wrote
on May 15
th
, 2014 at 9:41am:
I just read that the cat followed up by visiting the dog house later that night, dropping some Willie Pete in on the sleeping dog. #epochsfamiliarFTW
Sim-Sala-Bim wrote
on Jan 27
th
, 2014 at 2:09am:
It seems like Epoch never loses his popularity.
Even against donuts.
IP Logged
Glenalth
Puppy Farmer
Offline
Not banned, just bored
Posts: 1602
Location: Albuquerque
Joined: Sep 13
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #37 -
May 29
th
, 2011 at 12:02am
Print Post
Epoch wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 11:41pm:
Game mechanics, fun stuff. I figured that since you were part of the silverish dragons you knew that. They used to be pretty knowledgeable about that stuff awhile ago. Are they still active? I hardly ever see you guys around anymore.
They may have died of old age.
WWW
IP Logged
Epoch
Alaskan Ice Hole
Offline
Epochalypse
Posts: 10377
Location: Frozen Tundra
Joined: Aug 29
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #38 -
May 29
th
, 2011 at 12:57am
Print Post
Glenalth wrote
on May 29
th
, 2011 at 12:02am:
They may have died of old age.
I wouldn't make an order of around dragons if they didn't expend my life beyond old age. That is like serving some mortal claiming to be closer to God then the rest of humanity.
OnePercenter wrote
on May 15
th
, 2014 at 9:41am:
I just read that the cat followed up by visiting the dog house later that night, dropping some Willie Pete in on the sleeping dog. #epochsfamiliarFTW
Sim-Sala-Bim wrote
on Jan 27
th
, 2014 at 2:09am:
It seems like Epoch never loses his popularity.
Even against donuts.
IP Logged
Vissarion
DQ Assaulter
Offline
Posts: 493
Joined: Jul 23
rd
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #39 -
May 29
th
, 2011 at 9:57am
Print Post
Epoch wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 11:41pm:
Game mechanics, fun stuff. I figured that since you were part of the silverish dragons you knew that. They used to be pretty knowledgeable about that stuff awhile ago. Are they still active? I hardly ever see you guys around anymore.
Like I said, rangers are the one class I don't know much about, so sue me.
OSD is active, but we've had some turnover in older members lately as they've been trying out other games that the OSD community is involved in.
Theologians don't know nothin' about my soul
IP Logged
Razcar
Dragon Raider
Offline
Jag Älskar Drama!
Posts: 264
Location: Sverige
Joined: Aug 29
th
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #40 -
May 30
th
, 2011 at 10:27am
Print Post
Bigjunk wrote
on May 27
th
, 2011 at 3:09pm:
One would think? I don’t have the toons myself so I can’t say for certain. I’ve made a conscious effort to get my to-hit as hit as possible (Epic Spectrals, Tempest set, madstone, etc . . .) and they simply might not be geared as well. One of them was an 18/1/1 in his past life and said he didn’t have a problem then but does now. He did just TR and epics AC’d got raised by about 4 so that also could account for it.
I did this - TR:d from 18/r1/m1 to 12/rx/mx. I haven't noticed a worse to-hit - as mentioned, the BAB is 17 instead 18. And if you do not have aggro you'll boost your to-hit with Rogue Sneak Attack Accuracy II for a +1 higher to-hit than a Exploiter would have. Of course you will loose two F.E. mob types, but that's -2 from F.E Attack II on those. Not much. And you will loose FoM and one rank F.E. Damage and Defense. But you gain some S.A. damage, and if you're a little used playing Rogues you can make that work nicely for you, as well as the sweet Haste Boost.
IP Logged
someguy
Titan Demolisher
Offline
not really a drama fan
Posts: 390
Joined: Jan 12
th
, 2011
Re: Rangers
Reply #41 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 9:33am
Print Post
if youre going 12rgr/7rg/1mnk go unarmed and save yourself some larges. higher dps anyhow than even khops and higher to hit unless you somehow managed to fit in otwf. ddo forums search prodigy unarmed for more info. its a very high dps build. need tod bursts to be truly effective though.
IP Logged
Blank_Zero
Ex Member
Re: Rangers
Reply #42 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 12:58pm
Print Post
someguy wrote
on May 31
st
, 2011 at 9:33am:
if youre going 12rgr/7rg/1mnk go unarmed and save yourself some larges. higher dps anyhow than even khops and higher to hit unless you somehow managed to fit in otwf. ddo forums search prodigy unarmed for more info. its a very high dps build. need tod bursts to be truly effective though.
Higher than Khopesh? hmmm....maybe on 100% Fort...otherwise, the crit profile on Pesh's rocks it out. I've noticed the difference between my Monk and my Blitz. on the Abbot/Shroud Portals, my monk is by far and away better DPS. everything else, my Blitz wins out.
Although another good example of this is the Unarmed Assassin Builds (18/19 rogue and 1 monk/ 1fighter/1monk).
IP Logged
Bigjunk
Horoluth Raider
Offline
Hjeal meh!
Posts: 2686
Joined: Feb 2
nd
, 2011
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #43 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 1:40pm
Print Post
If I could ever pull a Shintao ring (seriously, in HUNDREDS of ToDs my rangers don't have them) I'd use it situationally. My human has 4 Tempest rings and my Elf 2, different Imbues for what they're doing.
Regarding the Horoth thing, I like having enough HP to laugh off a disintegrate, very tough to do that on a ranger. My human double-madstoned breaks 600 but it's hard to do double-madstone when you need boots of anchoring
IP Logged
Bigjunk
Horoluth Raider
Offline
Hjeal meh!
Posts: 2686
Joined: Feb 2
nd
, 2011
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #44 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 1:43pm
Print Post
Vissarion wrote
on May 28
th
, 2011 at 6:20pm:
Oh, wow, that's pretty stupid item design, then. I had always assumed that it worked like the Brawling Gloves piercing damage, since that just adds 1-4 damage regardless of DR. Had no idea that the 1-4 slashing damage was negated by DR.
In which case, then the Shintao set really does seem dramatically superior.
It is NOT affected by DR.
IP Logged
Bigjunk
Horoluth Raider
Offline
Hjeal meh!
Posts: 2686
Joined: Feb 2
nd
, 2011
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #45 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 1:51pm
Print Post
someguy wrote
on May 31
st
, 2011 at 9:33am:
if youre going 12rgr/7rg/1mnk go unarmed and save yourself some larges. higher dps anyhow than even khops and higher to hit unless you somehow managed to fit in otwf. ddo forums search prodigy unarmed for more info. its a very high dps build. need tod bursts to be truly effective though.
I'd like to see the numbers for this, they spelled out anywhere?
IP Logged
someguy
Titan Demolisher
Offline
not really a drama fan
Posts: 390
Joined: Jan 12
th
, 2011
Re: Rangers
Reply #46 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:05pm
Print Post
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=258272&highlight=unarmed+prodigy
a bit old but no dps changes to classes have been made that i know of since then. dont think any loss of auto crit changes anything and it may even gain some dps how helpless works now? it would probably be better as a horc now than halfling. pretty neat build i played it one life and i ripped everything ti shreds. i had a rogue past life in there though instead of extend. stunning blow may not be as good now end game with that build either. not that it was ever that impressive
IP Logged
Vissarion
DQ Assaulter
Offline
Posts: 493
Joined: Jul 23
rd
, 2010
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #47 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:21pm
Print Post
Bigjunk wrote
on May 31
st
, 2011 at 1:43pm:
It is NOT affected by DR.
Good to know. Thanks for the clarification.
someguy wrote
on May 31
st
, 2011 at 9:33am:
if youre going 12rgr/7rg/1mnk go unarmed and save yourself some larges. higher dps anyhow than even khops and higher to hit unless you somehow managed to fit in otwf. ddo forums search prodigy unarmed for more info. its a very high dps build. need tod bursts to be truly effective though.
I already have three unarmed builds; two pure monks, one of which is on the TR train, and a Godhand Half Orc. Not really interested in leveling another one, especially since the new crafting and lack of silver wraps really fubars unarmed builds vis-a-vis other classes.
That, and I can't imagine the Prodigy is actually better DPS than dual khopeshes. I'd need to see the numbers compared in the linked post to a similarly twinked out Khopesh user to believe that.
«
Last Edit: May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:23pm by Vissarion
»
Theologians don't know nothin' about my soul
IP Logged
Bigjunk
Horoluth Raider
Offline
Hjeal meh!
Posts: 2686
Joined: Feb 2
nd
, 2011
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #48 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:28pm
Print Post
I think the Ravager set is something else that needs to be factored in regarding the 12/7/1 and un-armed, that 2d6 a swing that won't work unarmed.
IP Logged
Bigjunk
Horoluth Raider
Offline
Hjeal meh!
Posts: 2686
Joined: Feb 2
nd
, 2011
Gender:
Re: Rangers
Reply #49 -
May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:30pm
Print Post
someguy wrote
on May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:05pm:
http://forums.ddo.com/showthread.php?t=258272&highlight=unarmed+prodigy
a bit old but no dps changes to classes have been made that i know of since then. dont think any loss of auto crit changes anything and it may even gain some dps how helpless works now? it would probably be better as a horc now than halfling. pretty neat build i played it one life and i ripped everything ti shreds. i had a rogue past life in there though instead of extend. stunning blow may not be as good now end game with that build either. not that it was ever that impressive
It looks like nonsense to me, as I said in the above post the Ravager and better crit-rage weapons should leave un-armed in the dust. I use un-armed against undead and that's about it. I've seen a few of these in action and I'm not impressed.
«
Last Edit: May 31
st
, 2011 at 2:31pm by Bigjunk
»
IP Logged
Pages:
1
[2]
3
Send Topic
Print
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Forum Jump »
Board Index
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
General
Spammer Honeypot
DDO-Specific Discussion ««
- DDO Dupe Store
- Builds
- Guides
Other Games
- Neverwinter-Specific Discussion
« Board Index
‹ Board
Vault
» Powered by
YaBB 2.6.11
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.