Balthazar wrote on Nov 25^th, 2011 at 2:32pm:


Because you preach to other people. Believe in a flying spaghetti monster or whatever you want, but don't bring it to my DDO forums.

Osharan Tregarth wrote on Nov 24^th, 2011 at 5:56pm:

I didn't get online much yesterday, so sorry I'm late in correcting this grievous error.

Snooth is NOT an "articulate, well reasoned moron."

He is an imbecile who thinks he is articulate, but who in fact cannot articulate his way out of a wet paper bag.

As for well reasoned, "It may work for you, but not necessarily anybody" is a CLEAR sign of one of those Evil Forum Abusers to him.

He is just a pure moron whose only redeeming quality is that he is so pitiful that some people cannot help but coddle him. I wouldn't be surprised if his absence was not his choice, personally, given how flagrantly he violates the community guidelines going after people. (Hint: Creating posts for the sole purpose of getting people infractions is in itself infraction worthy.)

Siver wrote on Nov 25^th, 2011 at 6:20pm:


ABUSER!!!1!

Siver wrote on Nov 25^th, 2011 at 11:59pm:

hahaha, this officially qualifies as the most dubious distinction ever.

Siver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2011 at 12:05am:

Exactly.

Oakianus wrote on Nov 26^th, 2011 at 12:05am:

Eh, could be worse. I could've just been trolling him for kicks, to see if I could push him to breaking the rules and getting a little "forum break." This would have been double bad, since I thought at the time the post he was making was done for the exact same reason. Turns out I was wrong, so horribly, horribly wrong!

This is a quote from him on the build he made for tanking...
"are you really worried about the 9 seconds after the first 6 are done? I mean, what change on the Hate List would bring about such a worry that building only an Intimitank is not sufficient?"

Yep, a tank build is considered a success if it has the potential to hold threat for 20% of the time! That reminds me. I still haven't figured out how the current intimidate works. I'm still assuming that it gives you hate and a threat boost, and no longer has the duration on holding the enemy's attention. Not that it matters much, since I don't plan on making a tank for a while.


Rather than boost my post count, I'm going to reply to Osharan Tregarth in this post:

Osharan Tregarth wrote Today at 1:12am:
Quote:


Yeah... You just pretty much defined of articulate, the adjective. If I cared, I'd ask if you actually looked the word up. The problem is, he's had several times when he uses the wrong word, or a word that doesn't mean quite what I think he intends, just because it's bigger than the appropriate word. I try to avoid doing that, personally, because I know that somebody with a better grasp on vocabulary is stalking forums, just waiting for some dumbass to pull something like that, just to swoop in and mock them with thesauruses disguised as posts.

As for logical, I'm pretty sure that well reasoned is similar enough to logical for any complaints regarding his logic or reasoning ability to apply to either. So, while you didn't mean to call him logical when you said he was articulate, you did imply it when you said he was well reasoned.

Siver wrote on Nov 25^th, 2011 at 6:20pm:


Well I know as a fact that I took part in giving him some vacation from DDO website with the Team Sorceror thingie.

I'm just waiting for the right post to report.

Oh 
Seems all his threads have been locked while I was sleeping and buying wine ( 9 boxes of 6 bottles + 3 other bottles Sometime it's great to be a Frog  )

Osharan Tregarth wrote on Nov 26^th, 2011 at 12:12am:


If being articulate means that you express one idea, however small or large it may be, to an audience by means of lengthy text that simply repeats the same message over an over again. Then I suppose, yes, he is articulate. However, sometimes you just have to wrap that shit up and get to the fucking point. Brevity is a courtesy. Snootch is a dickbagh.

His was argument was logical though in that it was consistent.  He argued that anyone can grind out 20 tokens, regardless of HP, get completionist and therefore "win ddo." 

The flaw wasn't in his logic, but his premise that getting completionist is the goal of every person he considers an abuser. 

I'm reminded of something I read earlier: if your priors are insane enough, even bayesianism won't save you. 

QuantumFX wrote on Nov 28^th, 2011 at 3:33pm:



Different guy.  Thankfully this nonsense is not on my server, we have enough problems.

Also, for what it's worth, it appears he is banned yet again.

I did notice that even subtle references to his shitty cleric build were getting outright deleted...no infraction, just disappeared.

rest wrote on Nov 28^th, 2011 at 4:01pm:


That was part of the reason I asked.  The Moral Guild guy was in a PuG spot on Fraid night (prior to the Let's start a moral guild grandstanding) and didn't say a word.  So, either Cable sent this guy on the straight and narrow path or he was doing it cause he was p-whipped.

Tobril wrote on Nov 28^th, 2011 at 6:28pm:


It’s DDO… with drinking rules.