Munkenmo wrote on Apr 4
th, 2014 at 10:08pm:
You seem to have the exact same opinion I do towards them.
Late last year the signatures became an issue and strake held a poll over what was NSFW.
Not sure what your problem is with what I've said here, either you missed the point or you're trying to troll.
If you truly agree that overly sexualised but covered pictures are NSFW then there's no need to post giant versions of them, or make your own sig version.
No beef specifically with you, i just meant that I don't give a shit about your opnion in the context of what Daze was saying:
Daze wrote on Apr 4
th, 2014 at 6:43pm:
Any argument from you for their removal went out the window with the larger posting after Munkenmo made his opinion known.
No argument for removal really, just making the point (in a big graphic way) that they are not "safe for work" at all.
Posting giant versions (they are the same images as were originally posted, just sized in the yabbc code tags) and making my own sig version seems to have had an initial effect. So I will leave it be for a while till it sinks in all around.
[img width=800 height=600]http://example.com/image.gif[/img]
(but whoever did the one below made it repeatable so I have presented it tiled for the effect is best at the original scaling)
Now if it is decided that the forum does not desire to be "safe for work" then fine. Post all the "non-nude" porn you want.
Admittedly trolling somewhat, but with a point.
Besides, watch your cpu usage on these pages with many copies of gifs... but now I've found some pretty neat gifs... all your cpu are belong to us! Muahahaha!
Pages: 
DDO isssues (Read 12408 times)
