noamineo wrote on Dec 22
nd, 2016 at 11:03am:
But this conversation is like trying to explain code architecture to a dog. You've now devolved past making actual arguments and are just spouting gibberish about you're own imaginary world.
Yes, it's like trying to explain architecture to a dog who happens to design industrial buildings for a living. But he's just a dog, and you know buildings because you live in one.
I like you, noamineo, but what the fuck is dissolving your brain, did you pop Molly and stare glassy eyed and slack jawed at the mobos until they started to make sense to you? You sound like a fanboi claiming that it must be impossible for Turbine to do whatever it is they aren't doing, and it's just too complex for us to understand. Do you have a picture of Holleyeyes pinned over your bed now, too?
Where are you getting this lawsuit crap, a Facebook news story? In Oracle V Google, the courts found that even releasing the whole header files wasn't infringing, and I said don't even go that far, just list the includes. Cisco V Arista couldn't make infringement stick and Arista copied their command line interface.
Unless Turbine sells the whole product, and you have yet to show me any indication that happened, they own their source and can release it, even if they licensed out their code. I can buy a book and the author can still sell it to somebody else, or make it available for free. They won't get sales after that if they make it free, but I can't sue them because I paid.
So show me some indication that there is a real cause for a lawsuit, or shut your uninformed fanboi blatherhole. Really, I can get Turbine apologist drivel from the mobos, I don't need to come here and hear it from you. They aren't refusing to do it because they can't, they're refusing to do it at worst because they don't give a shit about their customers, or at best because the code might lead to exploits in DDO. Lawsuits