Notanarc wrote on Nov 10
th, 2020 at 7:06pm:
Why wouldn't SSG put their own ad up on LinkedIn?
Simple incompetence, maybe? You do need a username
and a password to use LinkedIn.
But for reals this sort of thing is extremely common in the games industry. Daybreak has the profile and the actual exposure. They're using the "our" and "we" language to make it appear that they are one big company which owns multiple studios, which makes them appear much larger on the industry stage.
This ins turn makes it easier for them to attract better talent. Its a pretty standard bait-and-switch approach you see all over the tech industry(of which video games are technically a part) with particularly shady companies. Daybreak presents themselves as a large player who owns many studios, and that put them on the same level as Blizzard or EA. Suddenly potential hires who wouldn't look twice as 'standing stone games' are sitting up and taking notice.
Then you're halfway through the interview process before you figure out what's actually happening.
Its also possible SSG has outsourced its human resources department to Daybreak(this would not be
remotely surprising). Basically, rather than have your own in-house department to handle payroll, staffing, legal, etc, for the all of 6 people who actually work on the games, SSG has Daybreak do all that. Cuts down on headcount, but also makes them utterly dependent on Daybreak.
None of that however means that daybreak "owns" any of SSG. It just means the companies are slightly more intertwined that traditional publisher/studio relationships.