Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Lesser Hearts (Read 709 times)
OnePercenter
Advocatus Diaboli
*
Offline


Ants Eat Dead Grasshoppers

Posts: 9985
Joined: Dec 4th, 2011
Gender: Male
Lesser Hearts
Dec 9th, 2012 at 5:06pm
Print Post  
What does a +1 Lesser go for these days?

Edited:
cain't type
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2012 at 5:07pm by OnePercenter »  

Feynman wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 4:57pm:
One thing for everyone who is a "skeptic" on this issue: Insurance companies are basing their underwriting on the assumption that it is real. They are refusing to write policies on homes that are likely to be in danger from rising seas 20 years from now, even though the resale rate of the homes is so high that they could keep writing policies for another 10 years and still not have to pay out on 1 policy in 5, but that would be irresponsible. Unethical, as well, but that's never stopped anyone before.


IMARANGER wrote on Jan 11th, 2014 at 6:12pm:
It is fairly natural to assume that the fair price for the pot is the fair value of the resources I needed to make the pot plus the fair value of my labor.

IMARANGER wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 4:56pm:
You were right this time, OnePercenter. 


iliveyourdream13 wrote on May 14th, 2014 at 2:02pm:
#bringbackreadingcomprehension
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cdr
Horoluth Raider
****
Offline


sleetstormer

Posts: 2813
Joined: Dec 29th, 2011
Re: Lesser Hearts
Reply #1 - Dec 9th, 2012 at 8:19pm
Print Post  
On Sarlona, hearts are roughly 1M regardless of plus or type.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OnePercenter
Advocatus Diaboli
*
Offline


Ants Eat Dead Grasshoppers

Posts: 9985
Joined: Dec 4th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: Lesser Hearts
Reply #2 - Dec 9th, 2012 at 11:09pm
Print Post  
cdr wrote on Dec 9th, 2012 at 8:19pm:
On Sarlona, hearts are roughly 1M regardless of plus or type.


Thx. Looks ballpark from what have seen around.
  

Feynman wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 4:57pm:
One thing for everyone who is a "skeptic" on this issue: Insurance companies are basing their underwriting on the assumption that it is real. They are refusing to write policies on homes that are likely to be in danger from rising seas 20 years from now, even though the resale rate of the homes is so high that they could keep writing policies for another 10 years and still not have to pay out on 1 policy in 5, but that would be irresponsible. Unethical, as well, but that's never stopped anyone before.


IMARANGER wrote on Jan 11th, 2014 at 6:12pm:
It is fairly natural to assume that the fair price for the pot is the fair value of the resources I needed to make the pot plus the fair value of my labor.

IMARANGER wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 4:56pm:
You were right this time, OnePercenter. 


iliveyourdream13 wrote on May 14th, 2014 at 2:02pm:
#bringbackreadingcomprehension
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint