1.  Class's is not a word.  I'm not saying that you're using the wrong form, or that you're using some sort of slang.  I'm saying that it simply isn't a word.
2.  Guy's is a possessive.  Nothing here belongs to the guy.
3.  Guna is also not a word.
4.  Im is also not a word.  The contraction for "I am" is I'm, not im.
5.  Guna is still not a word.
6.  Rouge is a color.  Rogue is the class.
7.  Horribad is also not a word.
8.  Interest's is a possessive.  Your interest can't own anything.

Those eight errors were in three sentences, and I'm ignoring the fact that nothing was capitalized when plenty of things should have been.  You are ridiculous.

overbearing narcisism

Spelling-and-syntax-based drama: this forum is fucking awesome.

Now, which side to weigh in on?  Do I go with the proposition that any written communication which adequately conveyed its meaning was a successful one, in true "any landing you walk away from was a good one" fashion? 

Alternately, do I base my argument on the point that any poorly-written communication where a little thought would obviously have clarified matters is a snub to the reader, indicating a fundamental lack of respect for other participants in the conversation?

Or perhaps I should nitpick all sides.  I could make the point that easily-understood neologisms - particularly concatenations such as "horribad" - are a widespread, if sometimes inelegant, method of communicating emphasis.  I could note that "rouge" is a colour only in French and is a cosmetic in the English-speaking world.  Then I could deplore the over-use of ellipses in the respondent's post and finish off by noting that any post diverging too far from the standard of its root language is likely to be nigh-incomprehensible to readers who are not 100% fluent in said language.

But actually I think I'll just sit here and watch, reflecting on the fact that it's face-rockingly amazeballs () to be on a forum where you don't get infractions for linguistic pedantry, it really is.


As you were.

FIFY
While class's is widely considered an acceptable form, it is technically incorrect.
Think: ain't. For years and years it was never a word, but it was widely accepted as one regardless.  But just because it was widely accepted didn't make it correct.  Same goes here for class's.
Singular possessive: class'
Plural possessive: classes'
In the form he meant to use it: classes

Well the point of this thread was asinine.  He's asking for a beta key for a game that enters OPEN beta tomorrow morning.  There's nothing left to do here but be a Grammar Nazi.

They have custom channels, too (aside from guilds as well), so when you start making friends and finding players you like it will become much, much easier to manually group without the random factor.