kinggartk wrote on Mar 14^th, 2016 at 9:49am:


You mean like when Munk got punted for a leak here?

Maybe there hasn't been anything worth leaking yet?

PersonaNonGrata wrote on Mar 14^th, 2016 at 8:33pm:


A fellah, a QUICK fellah, might have a weapon under there. I'd have to pin his head to the panel... SMART fella, might just wait until the end of the PC season, and THEN post his tell-all expose, when he no longer has anything to lose.

Frank wrote on Mar 15^th, 2016 at 12:19am:

This would be the more sensible option.

pm's welcome remi of what is on the agenda

on the other hand I sometimes wish there were a secret love sock of epoch and 1% then again wouldn't it be much like p4p? .... welcome to the twilight zone.

stardate2115 wrote on Mar 15^th, 2016 at 5:19am:

You'll keep a GF longer if you go with the more standard, "honey," or "snookums".





(At least, that's what Secret Love Sock told me after we broke up....)

Asheras wrote on Mar 10^th, 2016 at 6:03pm:



well mister DDOT...# you are also copy pasting to "unofficial forums"maybe you can be next ?

spambot3000 wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 6:47pm:

It pains me to have to point this out to anyone.  What he has to lose is more time undercover to collect more dirt. 

It's a lousy spy who exposes themselves by falling for the first bit of misinformation that comes their way.  Not that Jerry is smart enough to do that in any event, but the principle still applies.

And maybe he enjoys it for what it is.  There's no accounting for taste.  The guy you laugh at for porking the fat chick is still getting laid while you and your hand are in an exclusive relationship.

https://www.ddo.com/forums/showthread.php/474192-If-a-member-of-the-2016-Players...

I would post this on the ddo forums, but would probably get banned with all the locked threads on the first page alone. I would PM him this but I would probably just get ignored.
So since I know this will be read by him, I'll post it here.

Are you going to get removed as a "link" to the Players Council? Mistakes and slips were made in the past and PC members were removed. You made the mistake of releasing the PC forums to the public. Is there going to be a double standard when mistakes are made or will you take responsibility in removing yourself from any involvement in the PC from this point on?

notajedi wrote on Apr 5^th, 2016 at 1:18pm:



No directing it at Cordovan to hold himself to the same standard he held others on the PC council to whom he kicked off for accidently leaking something.

He accidently leaked PC forums, he should remove himself from PC activities because of it.

kum-gulp wrote on Apr 5^th, 2016 at 1:31pm:



It's not an imagined standard I have for him. It's the standard he set when he has kicked people off the PC in the past for "accidently", mistakenly, or purposely revealing things in the PC forums.

mudfud wrote on Apr 5^th, 2016 at 4:55pm:


While I understand your anger at the double standard, Jerry isn't a player, he is an employee.  That puts him in a different category of things to be held accountable for.  And besides which, his double standards and fairly obvious favoritism already shows that his actions on the forums either have zero oversight or that they are known and approved.  In either case, good luck with your crusade, Don Quixote.