Shuy wrote on Oct 24
th, 2013 at 6:26am:
People who exploit, talking just about DDO and the examples Turbine gave us over the years, often are aware that all they will get is MAX 14 days ban and the removal of ill items. So, just a ban + the removal of such items just doesn't cut it anymore (it never did, Turbine just got this now).
They know it always worked like this:
1) you get caught and in the best case scenario, you will have a 14 days ban but you will keep your duped items.
2) you get caught and in the worst case scenario, your duped items will be deleted and you will have just wasted a couple of hours duping them + 14 days ban.
Basically, there was ZERO risks at all for exploiting. You see why this can't be the case anymore? It was a case of uber win (case 1) or meh, couple hours wasted (case 2).
Hence, they needed a third case scenario. Which is perfect for future exploits. Why? Because I (a generic I), who just exploited now but got away with it, the next time won't probably.
Unfortunately that is the fault of Turdbine’s inconsistency (more likely incompetence actually) over the years. If it was always option 2, people would be much less inclined since there would never be any reward and you suffer a temp ban. THAT is punishment. THAT would be a deterrent.
However, even their ‘Extreme Prejudice’ is the laughing stock of the game. Sure people are gone from 7-30+ days but when they are getting to keep most of their stuff, you are indeed correct there is little risk and a large reward. But Turdbine’s inability to properly (do anything) is not an excuse to go hog wide and run roughshod over players. Doing so only encourages MORE bad behaviour.
Shuy wrote on Oct 24
th, 2013 at 6:59am:
Next time, don't exploit and you won't risk anything. I know, it's stupid right?
Sadly we know this is not the case. People that did not dup having been caught up in this merely by association.
(this also ignores the sad fact that only half the people I know dup were caught)