Strakeln wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 9:55pm:

Can I be the balif? I already have the stun gun!

There's a big difference between whining and telling you that you're full of shit. And I have no intention of leaving, though it would make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside. I think you're being an ass and yet think you're better than other people that act like an ass, and that's pretty pathetic. I also think it's amusing how you claim to not really care about Oak and haven't let him under your skin, and yet you remember his usual phrases, searched his posts for them, and made up an entire game - with rules - just for him. Maybe someday gay marriage will be legal in NC, so don't lose hope!

Grace wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 10:39pm:


Who do you think woke him up with that morning BJ?

Strakeln wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 10:37pm:

Dibs on defense counsel!  My qualifications:

(1) I will appear late and be drunk.

(2) I will use only alibi as a defense, paying witnesses with TP to establish that at the time of the alleged offsense, the accused was buying plat from Chinese child labor in the harbor and so couldn't possibily have been posting in the Vault.

(3) *Think* about it, if they are represented by counsel, they can't speak in their own defense and have to go through me.  Me, who, as Stainer teaches, is utterly incomprehensible.  Sweet, huh?
 
(4) I get that this is supposed to be amusing, and that there are several assholes here who are rather obviously annoyed/jealous that Oak is up to bat and not them, certain that they are that they are MUCH worse.  What makes this sweet is Oak's doubtfulness that he wants this type of attention.  So I will not be upset, on no, not the least bit troubled, when my client inevitably loses.  For he does not yet understand that is an honor that you should deign to pick upon him.

(5) I will use the word "boobies' liberally since that seems to temporarily sooth the savage beasts about here.

(6) I think objections just slow everything down and annoy the jury, so the prosecutor will pretty much have free license in court.

(7) Should Stainer go on trial, which I don't think he should because he is, at the end of the day, often funny, I must decline to represent him based on a conflict of interest.  Which is, you see, that I am him, my account is a dummy account and I am just Stainer trolling myself. And a lawyer who has himself/herself for a client is a fool.

(8) I could passive-aggressively make this point even longer, but this no one doubts.

Best
Fucking
Thread
Ever

Just saying  ....and now we return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast....

Quote:

I have not been paying attention to this thread nearly enough if Nancy is taking out her boobies.  You go girl.  As balif I better check those things to make sure they are not dangerous.

*edited to change Grace to Nancy - WTF is with you two, I can't seem to separate you - I think somewhere I heard Nancy Grace and stuck the two of you into one person.

Grace wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 11:03pm:

I never, EVER apologize for tasering someone.  If you didn't deserve it now you likely would have deserved it later.


I will however apologize for confusing the two of you.  I have done it tons.

stainer wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 9:46pm:


SO THATS WHY YOU LOST YOUR MOD STATUS

Grace wrote on Feb 1^st, 2012 at 11:03pm:

LOL, no I said as defense counsel I would use the word because it's what these savages *get.*  LOL.  Now, I have no doubt someone saw the word and just read to themselves that boobies were being taken out because, well, they are men.  It's not their fault.  God made them that way.  God knows why.

Quote:

I wonder who Nancy might be talking about?

Quote:


you cant tell me this is not arousing.

Why is she pink?

stainer wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2012 at 12:09am:

Except the street is full of explosions. Explosions and knives.