I triple-dog dare Puerto Potty to sign up. That would be fucking hilarious.

noamineo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:



No, he would suck so much developer cock you wouldn't believe it. Those couple days he was on ddochat, he was total kiss-ass until the fouth or fifth time the devs blew off his ignorant complaints. It was only then he started being whiny enough they booted him.

Puerto Potty, would rim Cordo to get on the PC, but they won't pick him, he's a joke on Sarlona and not the kind of joke Turbine likes.

WonderfulFoppyBint wrote on Jan 12^th, 2016 at 3:33pm:


I've applied

Flav wrote on Jan 12^th, 2016 at 1:20pm:


Actually, leaking stuff isn't that hard.  Nor is it easy for them to catch you.  I have a number of throwaway identities that don't tie in any way to my turdbine account.  The trick is to not give any identifying details in the leaks that can be tracked back.

I guess the question is would the data you get and subsequently leak be of any value? We can all generally predict what sort of crap turbine will pull next. Its a lot of effort to go through just to know exactly what the consistency would be like.

I'd be all over the PC if turbine ever actually listened to them. I'm their ideal sounding board, I'm not terribly invested in the game nor am I focused entirely on power and nothing else. I do constructive criticism like nobody's business. But it's a huge waste of my time since all they want is yesmen.

OldCoaly wrote on Jan 12^th, 2016 at 6:19pm:


If somebody is doing that way, I hope they at least learn how to use the ctrl + h... eventually...

It may even be faster that way. "<*>" = ""

Is it weird that I almost feel like applying, so I could have access to the PC forms again?

Artorias wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:59am:

This and rofl.

Artorias wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:59am:


Note how I said again. I was on the first PC with Flav. I didn't like it much. Ppl are too sensitive, and the stuff put in front of the PC is already developed. But I still think ppl should apply and try it out.

Galadriel wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:33am:


Active is very relative. Activity requirements seem very low.

Angry wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 8:00am:


Example?

Galadriel wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 8:51am:




Flav can give you specific details on how they like it more, just PM him 

painkiller wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 8:34am:


Well I can't say for 2015.

In 2014, most of us weren't, yes men. 

When we found an idea shitty, we told them the idea was shitty.
When we found an idea to be bad for the game we told them it was bad for the game...

example here : http://www.ddovault.com/Vault/Raids.txt

When we found an idea good we said so ( eg : Mirror of Glamouring )

You just need to understand that Turbine may or may not act upon what you say...
( again typical example above : they waited for a more comprehensive PC and probably presented it another way so that it went through )

What Turbine wants from the PC is feedback on ideas. the state of the idea will vary from first stage of thinking about it ( for the 2014 PC it was Epic Vale : with or without Greensteel ? for example ) to nearly completed stuff ( example : any update that contained items, they were mostly done, and they were just tweaked ).
And all the stage in between.