Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 35 Replies) Hostile takeover (Read 11570 times)
Novalis
Dragon Raider
***
Offline


I may be a bastard but
I'm not a fuckin' bastard

Posts: 234
Joined: Nov 19th, 2015
Hostile takeover
Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:24pm
Print Post  
Cordo-cuck and Severed-limb now running the show for both Turbine PC platform DDO and LOTRO MMO's

https://www.ddo.com/forums/showthread.php/477136-More-info-re-Turbine-layoffs-am...
what-now?s=ec71581d09f1cda5042df0268c77c300


Could it be any more blatant WB and Turbine wanna run this game into the ground as quickly and in the most shitty way possible?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
karavek
Titan Demolisher
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 362
Joined: Jul 15th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #1 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:43pm
Print Post  
I actually put far more of the blame on turbine. WBs SOP for a good while is to crank out a game and then pull all support. They don't really care one way PR another after and just kind of bet on it making back what it costs.
A good exams would be Gotham Imposters. Its actually a well made MOBA that had pay to unlock but nothing that couldn't be unlocked through play as well. However it literally had its entire dev team pulled as soon as it was released and stopped with any stability maintenance within its first six months. It ended up one of the great steam con's as any money you pay into will never benefit the game itself.

And that's where the real disconnect is. Many players wrongly assume subscriptions and micro transactions are at least partially reinvested back into the game they spend it on. Very rarely is that true.

From info I've read from former turbine employees that has always largely been DDOs main issue as well. Almost every dime ever spent by the players went to lotro or even worse was part of several mil in funds and dev time spent on things like a harry potter MMO mock up to court WB with as early as 2009.

Some developer studios like cryptic did this with titles like champions for so long eventually they got a bad rep for it and started the champions will get only what it earns after they had so much player bleed out and those left had already bought lifetime subs making it into a stagnant backwater MMO.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Asheras
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline


This is why we can't have
nice things.

Posts: 10230
Location: Ohio
Joined: Jun 9th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #2 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm
Print Post  
One of the problems with LoTRO is that the IP is kinda played out at this point.  Peter Jackson made some incredible, amazing movies from 2000-2003.  Then came back for a victory lap that got extended into 3 victory laps and kinda fell off a creative cliff and audience fatigue definitely set in.  Despite beautiful film work, sets, costumes, and effects.  After 6 movies (which, based on length, could easily be 9) over 13 years, I don't think they have a lot of stories to tell in this universe that people want to see in the near future. 

I think the IP needs a break before it can be revisited.  Probably about a decade.  Two decades if you want to do a remake of LoTR or Hobbit.  Don't get me wrong.  There is a lot of material in the IP to find interesting stories in that world.  But, I just don't think there is the energy in the audience or the studio to make something happen. 

That means the game is kinda on its own for now.  That's a rough place to be with WB.

I think WB would prefer to do cross platform IP management.  Coordinated Movies + TV + games all around the same IP.  Given that LoTR future development is pretty much limited to games only (and the existing one is in a sub-genre that they don't want to emphasize), LoTRO is in a rough spot.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Novalis
Dragon Raider
***
Offline


I may be a bastard but
I'm not a fuckin' bastard

Posts: 234
Joined: Nov 19th, 2015
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #3 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 2:05pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:43pm:
I actually put far more of the blame on turbine. WBs SOP for a good while is to crank out a game and then pull all support. They don't really care one way PR another after and just kind of bet on it making back what it costs.

Some developer studios like cryptic did this with titles like champions for so long eventually they got a bad rep for it and started the champions will get only what it earns after they had so much player bleed out and those left had already bought lifetime subs making it into a stagnant backwater MMO.


This had been one of the points I've been trying to make for quite some time. The very last time I felt like DDO was moving in a progressive  and forward manner was back in late 2014 when I returned to the game after a 2 year hiatus. It was the last time I spent real cash on the game. It quickly had the veil lifted that the microtransactions at the beginning of 2015 were going to be the focus of DDO rather than improving the gaming experience. This was proven in Turbine's move to nerf tome drops and orange champ chest drops after the mimic event in Apr 2015. People were getting too many tomes or just too many chests and this was seen as concessions. Couldn't have that. Need more pointless opportunities crreated for revenue.

Ever since then, the clusterfuck was becoming more and more transparent especially leading up to legendary greensteel. Now it feels like they actually still expect people to drop real money on a game that according to the basic license agreement, can end tomorrow and if I understand correctly, anyone who paid for points or in game items will have gotten taken to the cleaners.

What has confounded me and has made me spend many days trying to vent my anger is the atrocious way the people who are now responsible for turning DDO into the pit of shit they made it are seemingly being rewarded for their acts of sabotage. Even Everquest has a legacy following, why would they be allowed to drain every last red cent from loyal players into a game that is being turned into a wretched marketing experiment now that they aren't reaching their bottom line revenue goals? It's not like they couldn't have. If they would have actually had pride in their work and put some artistic passion in making the game fun or even more complicated, just not making the game any worse, there would have been much better revenue over the years. But I don't even think it's about revenue anymore. It's gotten personal with some of the Turbine employees in the last 2 years, and maybe that's why it's gotten very personal for me.



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Novalis
Dragon Raider
***
Offline


I may be a bastard but
I'm not a fuckin' bastard

Posts: 234
Joined: Nov 19th, 2015
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #4 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 2:14pm
Print Post  
Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm:
 

That means the game is kinda on its own for now.  That's a rough place to be with WB.

I think WB would prefer to do cross platform IP management.  Coordinated Movies + TV + games all around the same IP.  Given that LoTR future development is pretty much limited to games only (and the existing one is in a sub-genre that they don't want to emphasize), LoTRO is in a rough spot.


WB has a very consistent track record for "cutting of its nose" for the sake of a few cents. One of the members of the PC had the misfortune of working for a company that was bought up by WB. In order to improve future sales, they made mass layoffs, streamlined a ma & pa operation with their corporate brand of sales and marketing thus alienating the previous return customers that made it initially successful.

WB doesn't give a shit. All you have to do is look at their treatment of the new Batman. It made money but they got crucified in the reviews. So what did they do? Everyone loathed Affleck and they gave him carte blanche control over the next 2 movies and creative power over his appearance in Suicide Squad. This is WB logic. As long as it functions as an acquisition for a time it is only good business to create the conditions for it to fail. We are seeing that in DDO, now LOTRO and it's no secret because WB has been doing this for now decades.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hyplo
Korthos Resident
*
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 62
Joined: Feb 11th, 2014
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #5 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 3:13pm
Print Post  
This is not a defense of Turbine, What they have done to DDO is inexcusable and destruction of a decent MMO.

The future of DDO is probably more linked to contract negotiations between two titans in the world of shitty companies to work with, Warner Brothers and Middle Earth Enterprises.   In a way the two companies deserve one another, too bad however it may take DDO down with it.

The current license for LotRO expires mid 2017, the rights for additional films (The Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales, Tom Bombadil and the Red Book) are currently in state of failed negotiations between MEE and WB/Wingnut/New Line.   

Word on the street is WB/Turbine is playing hardball and MEE is not willing to blink at the moment because they feel the movie rights are more lucrative.      And considering how played out the IP is for the hardcore players Turbine needs some concessions or additions from MEE to continue operating. 

So what happens at Turdbine if they lose the LotRO license.   I'm guessing it not good for DDO.

The only saving grace for DDO players is moving DDO into a maintenance mode or shutting down may be too expensive of a monetary penalty in terms of the contract between Hasbro/WotC and Turbine.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Asheras
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline


This is why we can't have
nice things.

Posts: 10230
Location: Ohio
Joined: Jun 9th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #6 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 3:29pm
Print Post  
hyplo wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 3:13pm:
This is not a defense of Turbine, What they have done to DDO is inexcusable and destruction of a decent MMO.

The future of DDO is probably more linked to contract negotiations between two titans in the world of shitty companies to work with, Warner Brothers and Middle Earth Enterprises.   In a way the two companies deserve one another, too bad however it may take DDO down with it.

The current license for LotRO expires mid 2017, the rights for additional films (The Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales, Tom Bombadil and the Red Book) are currently in state of failed negotiations between MEE and WB/Wingnut/New Line.   

Word on the street is WB/Turbine is playing hardball and MEE is not willing to blink at the moment because they feel the movie rights are more lucrative.      And considering how played out the IP is for the hardcore players Turbine needs some concessions or additions from MEE to continue operating. 

So what happens at Turdbine if they lose the LotRO license.   I'm guessing it not good for DDO.

The only saving grace for DDO players is moving DDO into a maintenance mode or shutting down may be too expensive of a monetary penalty in terms of the contract between Hasbro/WotC and Turbine.



WB grossed 6 billion dollars on LoTRO and The Hobbit.   The production budget on all 3 LoTR movies combined was $1 billion.  (The first 3 LoTR movies cost $250 total combined and each Hobbit movie was $250 per.  Which is crazy, but still).

I think there is audience fatigue, but I'm surprised that WB hasn't thrown stacks of cash at MEE.  They have made a mint on the LoTR IP. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Puppy Farmer
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 1429
Joined: Jan 14th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #7 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:11pm
Print Post  
Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm:
[snippage] Peter Jackson made some incredible, amazing movies from 2000-2003.  Then came back for a victory lap that got extended into 3 victory laps and kinda fell off a creative cliff and audience fatigue definitely set in.  Despite beautiful film work, sets, costumes, and effects.  After 6 movies (which, based on length, could easily be 9) over 13 years, I don't think they have a lot of stories to tell in this universe that people want to see in the near future.
There are a lot of stories left in the LotR universe.  Just look at all of the books which haven't been made into movies yet.  Silmarilian, etc.    Tolkien was a prolific writer and churned out a richly detailed setting with characters and back stories which could easily make a dozen other movies.

But you have a point about the length.  I've hosted parties where I've queued up different movie series in different rooms.  The room where I queued up the LotR trilogy, directors cuts, was always the simplest.  Because it will last longer than most guests who aren't spending the night.


Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm:
I think the IP needs a break before it can be revisited.  Probably about a decade.  Two decades if you want to do a remake of LoTR or Hobbit.

You'd think that.  But then there are things like the Spiderman reboot.  I watched the first reboot movie with an Uncle, and afterwards we discussed it.  My take was that is was a decent remake, it had a few improvements such as incorporating the technological web slingers as opposed to the first movies where it was just a part of his powers.  That was more true to the comics, but frankly (if I can cite myself) the comics pretty much got it wrong by making it a technological thing instead of an innate power anyway.

But the bottom line was:  Slightly different, but not enough to make it worthwhile as a different movie.

I know there were licensing issues or whatever that made the reboot a necessity, but still.  Too soon, and not necessary.  Some movies make a lot of sense as a remake, since technology marches on and they can far better represent the actual story using new technology.  The Spiderman reboot didn't have that as a reason to reboot, IMO.
  

No, let me be Frank.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:39pm:
I've had multiple RoSS rot just from doing the explorer points in Sands across multiple lives since it is exclusive.


Smart players know how to use buyback.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:
I will not chone.

I did what I did intentionally and while my primary purpose was not to annoy the other Vaulties, I acknowledge that it was a side effect.


Smart people don't elicit "side effects."  They understand in advance the consequences of their actions.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
karavek
Titan Demolisher
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 362
Joined: Jul 15th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #8 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm
Print Post  
I think people here underestimate the rabid fanboism of the hard core lotr   group. They live in a state of delusion where in their mind Tolkien is the inventor of the mythical fantasy genre rather then just a guy who adapted  old tales and sagas in much the same way Disney has with many like snow white cindarella and so many others.

They even like to claim him as the reason for gygax creating DND. Inspire of the man himself going on record he hated hobbits and stories in general that could be called coming of age tales. His personal inspirations where Howard's conan, Lieber's gray mouser and fafhrd, and Moorcock's Elric of melnibone'. Series all about men who from the very start are above and beyond common men, adventurers by the very same definition that it was used in the greyhawk setting where those of the adventurer social caste where a unique status in the eyes of the people above even the nobility and nearly equal to the royal bloods. In fact gygax hated demi humans as player characters because he felt humans simply could not really mentally capture the role of inhumans and hence why all his sources of inspiration where human characters. It was Dave who insisted on including the high fantasy races and blending in Tolkien elements both due to a personal taste and as a potential to draw in more interest from that fan base.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Puppy Farmer
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 1429
Joined: Jan 14th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #9 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm:
I think people here underestimate the rabid fanboism of the hard core lotr   group. They live in a state of delusion where in their mind Tolkien is the inventor of the mythical fantasy genre rather then just a guy who adapted  old tales and sagas in much the same way Disney has with many like snow white cindarella and so many others.

Yes, yes.  All stories derive from the same ur-stories.  We get it.  Nothing is new under the sun.

karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm:
They even like to claim him as the reason for gygax creating DND. Inspire of the man himself going on record he hated hobbits and stories in general that could be called coming of age tales. His personal inspirations where Howard's conan, Lieber's gray mouser and fafhrd, and Moorcock's Elric of melnibone'. Series all about men who from the very start are above and beyond common men, adventurers by the very same definition that it was used in the greyhawk setting where those of the adventurer social caste where a unique status in the eyes of the people above even the nobility and nearly equal to the royal bloods. In fact gygax hated demi humans as player characters because he felt humans simply could not really mentally capture the role of inhumans and hence why all his sources of inspiration where human characters. It was Dave who insisted on including the high fantasy races and blending in Tolkien elements both due to a personal taste and as a potential to draw in more interest from that fan base.

If Gygax hated Hobbits, then why did he put Hobbits in his game, and then had to change then into Halflings because he was stealing Tolkien IP?  No, there is no denying that Tolkien was a huge influence on Gygax and his D&D game.

And don't go citing Gygax about what Gygax thinks too much, or with too much confidence.  He is (was) a very egotistical figure not unlike Trump who contradicted himself quite often.  If you judge him by his actions rather than his words, as all of us should be judged, you can quite easily see what he really valued and how he really acted.
  

No, let me be Frank.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:39pm:
I've had multiple RoSS rot just from doing the explorer points in Sands across multiple lives since it is exclusive.


Smart players know how to use buyback.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:
I will not chone.

I did what I did intentionally and while my primary purpose was not to annoy the other Vaulties, I acknowledge that it was a side effect.


Smart people don't elicit "side effects."  They understand in advance the consequences of their actions.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Asheras
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline


This is why we can't have
nice things.

Posts: 10230
Location: Ohio
Joined: Jun 9th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #10 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm
Print Post  
Frank wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:11pm:
There are a lot of stories left in the LotR universe.  Just look at all of the books which haven't been made into movies yet.  Silmarilian, etc.    Tolkien was a prolific writer and churned out a richly detailed setting with characters and back stories which could easily make a dozen other movies.

But you have a point about the length.  I've hosted parties where I've queued up different movie series in different rooms.  The room where I queued up the LotR trilogy, directors cuts, was always the simplest.  Because it will last longer than most guests who aren't spending the night.


You'd think that.  But then there are things like the Spiderman reboot.  I watched the first reboot movie with an Uncle, and afterwards we discussed it.  My take was that is was a decent remake, it had a few improvements such as incorporating the technological web slingers as opposed to the first movies where it was just a part of his powers.  That was more true to the comics, but frankly (if I can cite myself) the comics pretty much got it wrong by making it a technological thing instead of an innate power anyway.

But the bottom line was:  Slightly different, but not enough to make it worthwhile as a different movie.

I know there were licensing issues or whatever that made the reboot a necessity, but still.  Too soon, and not necessary.  Some movies make a lot of sense as a remake, since technology marches on and they can far better represent the actual story using new technology.  The Spiderman reboot didn't have that as a reason to reboot, IMO.


The hard core LoTR fans won't push a movie over the profit point.  They cost 250 million per to make.  You need the masses to get that to profitability. 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying a movie would flop.  I'm just saying that they might start seeing some diminishing returns.  Resting the IP for a little while could be a good move.

I think there are plenty of stories to tell and I'd love to see an ongoing LoTR movie chain or TV series.  But getting MEE to license it is going to be a trick, apparently.  And, if they have to wait and end up building up a little audience anticipation and longing, all the better.   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OldCoaly
Puppy Farmer
****
Offline


Why did you think this
time would be different?

Posts: 1564
Location: WAAHH!!!Testing stuff is HARD!
Joined: Jul 1st, 2011
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #11 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 5:02pm
Print Post  
Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying a movie would flop.  I'm just saying that they might start seeing some diminishing returns.  Resting the IP for a little while could be a good move.


Too forward thinking, won't happen.
  

Groo The Wanderer wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 10:43pm:
they will probably congratulate themselves on how long they "kept it going" never able to see that it could have easily managed to keep itself going for far longer if they had just meddled far less drastically and with some semblance of an actual gameplan.
Darth Anonymous wrote on Feb 1st, 2014 at 1:11pm:
Hearing something has "merit" but we don't have "time" kind of says everything about how Turbine works on things.
eighnuss wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 12:52pm:
everyone but turbine knows that we are sad they are destroying our game
majmalphunktion wrote on Aug 30th, 2013 at 12:12am:
I don't make the game, I just get tested what they build. Sorry you are not happy.
Skoodge wrote on Nov 27th, 2014 at 6:54am:
DDO is easy to summarize - the greatest game to suck the most ass.
GooFY wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 5:36pm:
Turbine - So incompetent that we are skeptical when they report their own incompetence.  
Meursault wrote on May 11th, 2015 at 8:10pm:
Other companies will settle for shitting out garbage, Turdbin actually prefers to. Especially if they can get us to buy it, that just cracks them up.
Meursault wrote on Nov 12th, 2015 at 2:50pm:
Breaking something and putting it back together isn't as good as not breaking it to begin with, it's not even close.
palmer01 wrote on Nov 20th, 2015 at 9:05am:
Devs do not care what players want - they already have an agenda and give out token gestures so the paladins can feel worthy.
PersonaNonGrata wrote on Oct 4th, 2016 at 1:24am:
The DDO devs aren't motivated by a positive user experience.

Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Puppy Farmer
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 1429
Joined: Jan 14th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #12 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 5:10pm
Print Post  
Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm:
The hard core LoTR fans won't push a movie over the profit point.  They cost 250 million per to make.  You need the masses to get that to profitability.

Well, I agree, but I think we're still in disagreement.

It doesn't take 'hard core' LotR fans to make a movie successful.  How many 'hard core' LotR fans do you think actually exist?  The LotR movies and the Hobbit movies weren't successful because they drew in the 'hard core' LotR fans, but because they were good movies in their own right.

Asheras wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm:
Resting the IP for a little while could be a good move.

Because letting the memory of a good movie fade over time has always been a smart business move.
« Last Edit: Jul 18th, 2016 at 5:13pm by Frank »  

No, let me be Frank.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:39pm:
I've had multiple RoSS rot just from doing the explorer points in Sands across multiple lives since it is exclusive.


Smart players know how to use buyback.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:
I will not chone.

I did what I did intentionally and while my primary purpose was not to annoy the other Vaulties, I acknowledge that it was a side effect.


Smart people don't elicit "side effects."  They understand in advance the consequences of their actions.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
eighnuss
Epic Poster
*****
Offline


ด้้้้้ ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩ
ͩͩͩͩͩͩ

Posts: 3532
Location: ด้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็  ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩ
Joined: Jan 30th, 2013
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #13 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 6:15pm
Print Post  
  

ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩDISCLAIMER: This post is provided �as is� for informational purposes only. The Department of Vault
Security (DVS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within. DVS
does not endorse any commercial product or service referenced in this post or otherwise.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
eighnuss
Epic Poster
*****
Offline


ด้้้้้ ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩ
ͩͩͩͩͩͩ

Posts: 3532
Location: ด้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็  ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩ
Joined: Jan 30th, 2013
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #14 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 6:18pm
Print Post  
listen that post was stupid and i didnt read any of the replies before i made it

this post is exactly the same

ddo sunk to hell / ascended to heaven the very same day that its founder, a faggot basement dwelling retard, sold his distraction from masturbating to WB. imagine being a gay retard, producing the pinnacle of your potential, and then turning it into millions of dollars. That is the story of DDO.

Praise be to he who hath succeeded.
  

ͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩͩDISCLAIMER: This post is provided �as is� for informational purposes only. The Department of Vault
Security (DVS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within. DVS
does not endorse any commercial product or service referenced in this post or otherwise.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
noamineo
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline


All men fear time, but
time fears the pyramids

Posts: 9183
Location: Titan
Joined: Jul 2nd, 2014
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #15 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:11pm
Print Post  
Novalis wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 1:24pm:
Could it be any more blatant WB and Turbine wanna run this game into the ground as quickly and in the most shitty way possible?


This attitude has never made sense to me.

If WB doesn't want to run the game anymore, they would stop hosting it, turn off the servers, and move on. "Running it into the ground intentionally" Does literally nothing besides cost money.

If all they cared about was money, they'd make the micro-transactions even more "p2w"-ey than they are now(more point sales, make ottos boxes cheaper, just straight-up sell top-tier loot, etc)

Did they make a bad decision? Definitely. Was it made with the specific intention of "ruining the game" Obviously-fucking-not. They aren't trying to kill the game. If they wanted it dead, all they'd have to do is unplug the server.
  

I'll never understand the propensity of people to brag about being good at a video game. Its a toy you play with for fun. The only person who should be proud of you is your mother. If you're 3.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Puppy Farmer
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 1429
Joined: Jan 14th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #16 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:25pm
Print Post  
noamineo wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
If all they cared about was money, they'd make the micro-transactions even more "p2w"-ey than they are now(more point sales, make ottos boxes cheaper, just straight-up sell top-tier loot, etc)

Whatever happened to the 'flash sales'?  They still put up the timer for their regular sales events, but the 'flash sales' were outside of that standard practice.

But then, I didn't even know about the 'flash sales' until they were halfway over.  A sale you don't bother to make known to your intended audience is likely to be a failure.  And then be judged a failure on the basis of sales figures, instead of the utter failure in communications.
  

No, let me be Frank.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 12:39pm:
I've had multiple RoSS rot just from doing the explorer points in Sands across multiple lives since it is exclusive.


Smart players know how to use buyback.

Digimonk wrote on Dec 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:
I will not chone.

I did what I did intentionally and while my primary purpose was not to annoy the other Vaulties, I acknowledge that it was a side effect.


Smart people don't elicit "side effects."  They understand in advance the consequences of their actions.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Revaulting
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline



Posts: 10143
Location: Not in my pants
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #17 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:39pm
Print Post  
Frank wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 5:10pm:
Because letting the memory of a good movie fade over time has always been a smart business move.

noamineo wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
Did they make a bad decision? Definitely. Was it made with the specific intention of "ruining the game" Obviously-fucking-not. They aren't trying to kill the game. If they wanted it dead, all they'd have to do is unplug the server.

This thread is filled with so much stupid, it gave me brain damage. Now I think these two posts of average intelligence are genius.
  

Silence is golden, but I only get silver rolls.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
karavek
Titan Demolisher
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 362
Joined: Jul 15th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #18 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:22pm
Print Post  
Frank wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:51pm:
Yes, yes.  All stories derive from the same ur-stories.  We get it.  Nothing is new under the sun.

If Gygax hated Hobbits, then why did he put Hobbits in his game, and then had to change then into Halflings because he was stealing Tolkien IP?  No, there is no denying that Tolkien was a huge influence on Gygax and his D&D game.

And don't go citing Gygax about what Gygax thinks too much, or with too much confidence.  He is (was) a very egotistical figure not unlike Trump who contradicted himself quite often.  If you judge him by his actions rather than his words, as all of us should be judged, you can quite easily see what he really valued and how he really acted.


Uhm bro the A to your Q is in the same thing you quoted I.e. Dave was both the Tolkien fan and the better business man knowing that for a product as niche as what their game would be needed to cast a wider net then just fans of old pulp magazine writers the number of copy of Tolkien's works printed and sold is staggering and likely was pretty impressive even in the 70s

Keep in mind Howard and lieber were members of what is known as the Lovecraft circle. And Lovecraft can be considered indirectly a godfather of DND. If you think that the strange otherworldly alien magitech that has been a part of DND since the barrier peaks doesn't have its roots there then it must be a forest/ tree thing.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
karavek
Titan Demolisher
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 362
Joined: Jul 15th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #19 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:27pm
Print Post  
Frank wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:11pm:
There are a lot of stories left in the LotR universe.  Just look at all of the books which haven't been made into movies yet.  Silmarilian, etc.    Tolkien was a prolific writer and churned out a richly detailed setting with characters and back stories which could easily make a dozen other movies.

But you have a point about the length.  I've hosted parties where I've queued up different movie series in different rooms.  The room where I queued up the LotR trilogy, directors cuts, was always the simplest.  Because it will last longer than most guests who aren't spending the night.


You'd think that.  But then there are things like the Spiderman reboot.  I watched the first reboot movie with an Uncle, and afterwards we discussed it.  My take was that is was a decent remake, it had a few improvements such as incorporating the technological web slingers as opposed to the first movies where it was just a part of his powers.  That was more true to the comics, but frankly (if I can cite myself) the comics pretty much got it wrong by making it a technological thing instead of an innate power anyway.

But the bottom line was:  Slightly different, but not enough to make it worthwhile as a different movie.

I know there were licensing issues or whatever that made the reboot a necessity, but still.  Too soon, and not necessary.  Some movies make a lot of sense as a remake, since technology marches on and they can far better represent the actual story using new technology.  The Spiderman reboot didn't have that as a reason to reboot, IMO.



I myself was not really seeing a point to the relaunch either until I saw the second one. Watch the scene of peter going g to see harry for the first time and play one of those long lost lovers reunited type song's then you will understand what crowd they where after. That ultra young gender confused angst tween PC crowd.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
karavek
Titan Demolisher
****
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 362
Joined: Jul 15th, 2016
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #20 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:31pm
Print Post  
Revaulting wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 7:39pm:
This thread is filled with so much stupid, it gave me brain damage. Now I think these two posts of average intelligence are genius.


Stupid? This isn't STUPID! THIS IS THE VAULT!

crap people will think I'm a Looney cunt like Fran if I use ! To often. But I was spoofing 300 so hopefully I'll be forgiven one time. Cry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Revaulting
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline



Posts: 10143
Location: Not in my pants
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #21 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:37pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
Stupid? This isn't STUPID! THIS IS THE VAULT!

Point taken.

karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
But I was spoofing 300 so hopefully I'll be forgiven one time.

Point taken ... away.
  

Silence is golden, but I only get silver rolls.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PersonaNonGrata
Shroud Slacker
***
Offline


I Love Drama!

Posts: 1063
Joined: May 3rd, 2015
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #22 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 9:03pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:27pm:
That ultra young gender confused angst tween PC crowd.


Wtf?
Is that a big demographic?
Shocked
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SirValentine
Korthos Resident
*
Offline


Never.

Posts: 89
Joined: Jan 11th, 2014
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #23 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 9:35pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:12pm:
His personal inspirations where Howard's conan, Lieber's gray mouser and fafhrd, and Moorcock's Elric of melnibone'. Series all about men who from the very start are above and beyond common men


Don't forget Poul Anderdon's Holger Carlsen.  And his regenerating trolls.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
noamineo
Completionist (i.t.p.)
******
Offline


All men fear time, but
time fears the pyramids

Posts: 9183
Location: Titan
Joined: Jul 2nd, 2014
Re: Hostile takeover
Reply #24 - Jul 18th, 2016 at 9:46pm
Print Post  
karavek wrote on Jul 18th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
crap people will think I'm a Looney cunt like Fran if I use ! To often. But I was spoofing 300 so hopefully I'll be forgiven one time. Cry


The Vault does not forgive.
  

I'll never understand the propensity of people to brag about being good at a video game. Its a toy you play with for fun. The only person who should be proud of you is your mother. If you're 3.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint