DropBear wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 3:59am:



it doesn't.  I just wanted an excuse to use the word "drongo".

Quote:

Since DropBear highlighted this pablum, I'm gonna go ahead and point out the godawful math on display. Divide the posters in this thread (P) in half = P/2. Divide the effort Nothar puts into his build ideas in half = NotEffort/2. (Does "you would all" = P? I'm gonna go with P.) "Mosters" (M) seems to mean one Moster per poster. (There's a Seuss-rhyme in here, but I'm gonna stay focused, for a change.)

(P/2) + {(NotE)/2} = P Mosters.
Therefore P + NotE = 2P M.
Therefore NotE = P M.

Checks out so far. Nothar's effort at creating Mosters is equal to the effort of all the posters in the thread at creating Mosters. Unless somebody other than Nothar GAF about making Mosters, this is obvious, since Nothar is a poster in this thread, and Nothar + 0 = Nothar.



"[T]he effort you waste trying to bully [...] Nothar into constructive ideas" is punctuation-challenged. Does this mean Nothar can't be bullied into constructive ideas? Whatever. The effort wasted can be calculated using the formula, Poster Moster Effort = P triple completionists (3c), or bully and accuse (b+a) performing a mysterious function (F?) on NotEffort.


P (ME) = (b+a) F? NotE.

P (ME) = P (3c).
Therefore ME = 3c.

NotE = P M.
Therefore ME = {(b+a) F? P M} - P.

Further, if {(b+a)E F? Not},
then, M = {(b+a)E F? Not} - P - E.

You have to subtract all the posters from putting effort into bullying and accusing Nothar to get Mosters, not half.


Welcome back, Shade!

Hag Master wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 2:47pm:


laughing at something you dont understand is called being a sycophant. that's not a good thing to be.

I didn't say I wouldn't revel in your mental incompetence, I said I wouldn't respond to your posts about me. I will continue to revel in your mental incompetence, as always.

Hag Master wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 4:32pm:


That's pretty good.

Everything is better with more strippers.

My personal favorite thing to add stripper to is Catholic high mass. 

Revaulting wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 12:45pm:


RV - shouldn't this be prefaced with some kinda warning.
It started off surprisingly deceptive and easy, but before you know it, you're in over your head.
I need a coffee - it's too early for this stuff....   

Strakeln wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 7:31pm:


first time I thought the chick was going to break her neck.  she was hanging upside down and dropping headfirst to the stage then catching the pole with her thighs at the last minute.  I was so worried she'd die that my dick crawled up inside me like I was Caitlyn Jenner.

Strakeln wrote on Jul 13^th, 2015 at 7:31pm:


Yeah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCRP-5om_3Y

Sim-Sala-Bim wrote on Jul 14^th, 2015 at 1:07am:


I could watch that a dozen times and not get tired of it.
She is very good.
Her shoulders and arm strength must be phenomenal - the centripetal force in those spins would amplify her body weight and yet she holds on with just one hand.
Even though she is fully clothed, still awesome to watch.

Ok, well.  Wow drop bear my friend, you do have an imagination.

Strakeln wrote on Jul 14^th, 2015 at 2:25am:


Are we still talking about how she moves or......

The question is whether the pole is spinning or she is....I recall being gutted whilst in a gentleman's establishment watching a very talented young woman on a pole.... I was horrified when I realised she wasn't spinning around the pole but merely gripping the pole which was, of course, on bearings so spun with her.
looking at the excellent gif above it would seem the pole is spinning as well....
I was equally horrifed that my inner nerd was strong enough to let me notice this, rather totally focus on the near naked chick