Arkat wrote on Jun 18
th, 2013 at 12:00pm:
To be fair, the Head Leopard is no longer there. Perhaps his replacement will be a Tiger?
NewGuy's "
they recognize that several players are already very invested in Epic Destinies, this was absolutely part of the early design discussions" statement doesn't instill any confidence.
I don't believe that "
Actually "several" may be overstating when we are talking about maxing out all EDs. There is a good portion of players that focus on TR, and others that run only to cap picking up a couple ED's then roll an Alt. There are also casual players that don't play every week and take a very long time to take a character through content." was a typo.
I believe that Glin and the people responsible for the eTR framework revealed in Glin's initial post really believe that it will have a net positive effect on cash flow, and that any bad will generated by it will be confined to the "several" people who will have to re-acquire the ED benefits they already unlocked.
I think someone did a cost-benefit analysis and somehow came to the conclusion that using the same old content but corralling players through a new mechanic for ED progression was "better" than addressing the root cause for the paths that players discovered and chose.
I don't see any evidence of novel thinking on the part of Turbine in that announcement thread.
If Glin had opened with:
Quote:We're looking at making some enhancements to the TR framework, including some specific enhancements to TR as it relates to Epic Destinies.
We'd really like to give players more things to achieve with a high level TR type character (perhaps epic destiny past life feats, additional build points, but this hasn't been decided yet).
We've also been watching how many players currently go about earning ED XP, and we'd like to make that play experience more engaging for a wider audience.
We have some ideas, but we'd like to engage the community. Tell us what you think.
If Glin had begun the dialogue with something that looked open-ended, he would have gotten most of the same information that's buried in that impossibly long thread, but it wouldn't have been as confrontational.
With some careful steering comments from Varg and Piloto, they probably could have gotten the community to propose the same crap that Glin dumped on us, but they would have had community buy-in.
I'm not seeing anything different here than I've already seen before.
The last time Jerry said "Nothing's set in stone" he was speaking about the possibility of reversing the forum consolidation.